Saturday, 5 October 2013

Stabbed dogs and shady saboteurs.

Where do we start with this tale of lies, manipulation and greed?

Ziggy the dog hit internet fame after the owners claimed that the animal had been stabbed twice by a supporter of the badger cull.. Within hours the outpouring of hatred had spread across the saboteur camp and moments passed before a begging account was opened to pay for the poor animals vet bills.

There is more that meets the eye though. Not a single shred of evidence exists to support the claim that the dog was stabbed by anyone, let alone a cull supporter. A farm was mentioned by name in the press release style post that was copied and pasted in many of the saboteur facebook pages. This recklessly endangers the owner of the farm who is totally innocent of any wrongdoing. The owners claim to have a crime number from the police but no one has actually seen it.

The owner posted a copy of a vet bill to bolster her begging campaign.As you can see the phone number for the vet is clearly visible and although the date of the invoice is covered up the name of the dog is also visible.


The animal appeared in a post on Facebook, supposedly on the way to the vet for treatment for his stab wounds. Now I will be the first to admit that I am not a vet but I do have eyes and this is not a dog that has been stabbed.


Here is the picture after the visit to the vet.


This is a cute picture of a dog with a small bandage on its paw but no sign, once again of the laceration to the inside of the rear leg where the femoral artery runs. How strange is that?

According to Danny, one of the dogs owners Ziggy has been back to the vet and has made sure that every one knows this, after all her readers have stumped up pound notes to pay for these bills so they need to see that money is being spent.



The more I see about Ziggy the more suspicious I get and so should the people who donated their hard earned money.



To be continued.....

4 comments:

  1. a stab wound that required 2 stitches and not even one picture of the actual injury. More so there is no date visible on the bill.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely correct I've been suspicious from the start! Crazy, lying, emotional idiots the lot of them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As I said this was done to stir up hatred and scam money guess what it worked this story should have began once upon a time no denying the dog has an injury to its PAW which is no where near the artery

    ReplyDelete
  4. My question what was the dog doing running loose on private land in the middle of the night... Hope it didn't worry any livestock!

    ReplyDelete